Uncle James was a 6-foot-plus strong, soft-spoken, and highly articulate man. Uncle James knew how to be objective and when to be subjective. In every situation, he was a deeply principled man. A great writer and scholar. In his past life, he was an IBM executive and partner. One of the first people I knew who understood the pressures of performing in leadership and high-pressure situations. He showed that the gate was open to not only allow one to “climb the ladder" but also to lead with integrity. That short glimmer of light and hope revealed there was a path to the top, and that’s all I needed to see. He even helped me land a role with IBM, which I am grateful for. For me, IBM wasn't my style; I was more of an Apple kind of guy. My reality distortion field and counter-culture nature meant that I needed to be stimulated differently. IBM had some structures and lessons to offer, which, now looking back, I realize that the structure and rigor of IBM had a direct impact on him and how he engaged with business and relationships.

As an IBM executive, his character left an impression on me. Demeanor was that of a person who had been tried and tested over time. We often discussed the complexities of leadership, ethical dilemmas, and the challenge of maintaining integrity when it’s easy to compromise on core values and beliefs. James was a man of faith with strong values and a person who believed in the greater good. He always put others first. His humility was a source of inspiration, showing me how to play the game, how to maneuver among the corporate world, what to say, and when to say it. The way he handled business and carried himself was exemplary.

As a writer and reader, I delved into Uncle James’s writings, eager to understand his thoughts and perspectives. His book, as my mom and aunt mentioned, was a revelation. His articles in the Hellenic Pulse, shared on his Twitter and LinkedIn accounts, were not just impactful and timely but also culturally significant, providing a unique insight into the state of England today.

One of his pieces touched me: an article in the Hellenic Post on March 7th, entitled "The Tax Collector" with a picture of the Fall of Icarus by Jacob Peter Gawi. Gawi was a Flemish Baroque painter who collaborated with Peter Rubens in England. From what we see and understand from this picture, it's the Fall of Icarus, and it depicts a fall from grace, right? It tells a tragic story of Icarus' fall from the sky, and Jacob Gawi sought to capture the essence of the myth rather than convey intense emotion through it. The legend goes that the great Cretan king Minos was enjoying favor from Zeus, the legendary king of the gods. Minos' wife had an affair with a Cretan bull, which gave birth to the Minotaur, a monster. They decided to put the Minotaur in jail, so they hired Daedalus to build a confusing structure, the Labyrinth, from which it must never find a way out.

At some point, Daedalus decided to flee from Crete. He came up with a solution: build wings for his son, Icarus. The choice of imagery was poignant. As I read it, I realized why he wrote it. But I became confused and had to dig deeper into it to understand it.

Excerpt from James's last article, which he wrote in the Hellenic Pulse:

“Pharisee

​

And there is me, of course, lying in my quiet virtue, doing just as I was told. Perhaps, judging him a little bit.

​

I then realised that this is exactly the story of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector in the New Testament.

​

In Luke 18:9–14, Christ tells a parable about two men who go to the temple to pray.

​

The Pharisee stands proudly, thanking God that he is not like other sinners — especially the tax collector. He boasts about fasting and tithing (giving a tenth of his earnings to the poor).

​

The tax collector, standing at a distance, won’t even lift his eyes. He beats his chest and prays, ‘God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”

​

Flip

​

Christ concludes, ‘This man (the tax collector), rather than the other, went home justified before God.’

​

True righteousness comes from humility, not outward religious performance.

​

It is the truly humble that are justified, not the self-righteous.

​

It is a rebuke of spiritual pride and a reminder that honest repentance is more pleasing and fulfilling than boasting about honourable deeds (following instructions, acting well).

​

Humility out-trumps pride, repentance beats self-righteousness, and inner, quiet sincerity is greater that outward religiosity.

​

This parable flips social expectations — the ‘bad guy’ (tax collector) is accepted and made virtuous, and the ‘good guy’ (Pharisee) is not.

​

And there was me thinking, every time that I heard this story in church, that I was the tax collector. Whereas I was, in fact, the Pharisee. Who knew?

​

And even tough the gent opposite delayed his release by a couple of days, I myself then had a random mucus plug (look it up!), that also slightly delayed my discharge from hospital bed as well. Perhaps as cosmic / divine punishment for my Phaiseedom!

​

We learn.”

​

On the surface, James emphasizes the importance of behaving correctly, following the rules, and doing what's asked. But he also admits to sometimes judging others (which we all do) and believes he was being humbled. However, he realizes in his quiet compliance that he was acting like the Pharisee, and this is both painful and illuminating.

My interpretation was this: being morally superior and showing it is wrong. James shared this parable with my father. The “Pharisee vs. Tax Collector” story is biblical and used to illustrate spiritual misalignment. Scripture isn't just ancient teaching. It's a reflective lens for the modern ego. Greek philosophy adds weight to this lesson. James linked the moral lesson of hubris and nemesis—pride and its consequence. By drawing on Christian and Greek traditions, James underscored a timeless message about confidence. One's own virtue invites doubt. Whether through divine faith or myth, or by adapting Greek strategy, arrogance is corrected. The tax collector, the humble one, returns.

Even in the hospital, James kept his sense of humor. He didn’t dwell on guilt or self-reproach, but reflected with wit and humility. He even joked that minor health setbacks were cosmic punishment for his pride, though we knew they weren’t. We understood that James lived a life of lasting impact.

Wisdom isn't about knowing better; it's about being able to laugh at your flaws and grow from them. With James' final message, "Run home. Be nice, get home by six." He understood the takeaway: his voice, hubris, walks in truth. Be kind and try to make it home for dinner; it's a wink towards grounded morality. Grand lessons should still apply to daily life. For me, profound truth is often simple. Humility, honesty, and humanity are what matter most.

After his time at IBM, having spent 30 years in the IT industry, he quit IBM at the top of his game to teach maths. I wanted to know why maths? Why not something else? He replied I want to give back to the UK. I want to give back to the education system. He shared with me an excerpt from the 4th Industrial Revolution and the World Economic Forum, noting that the most significant gap was in mathematics and science, and that kids were struggling to understand math because they spend too much time on social media, making it challenging to develop analytical skills. He wanted to maintain consistency in the teaching of math in the educational sector, where schools struggle to retain and hire math teachers. One thing he told me, and I often reflect upon it, is that he enjoyed starting from the bottom again and being at the bottom of the rung, not having to worry about things like budgets. 

At this stage of life, he just wanted to teach. He had transitioned from a hiatus status to one of giving back. He touched on his time at IBM, which was a gratifying experience. The importance of planning in terms of being mentally, financially, and also physically prepared. He mentioned his time at St. Thomas More, where he found a rhythm in his new job. He went from being just a Maths and Science teacher to Department Head of Business in a few years and transformed the school, which is a very momentous achievement. Being at the school, he invited me to come and speak about the work I was doing in supporting Black Entrepreneurs. That's when I was at my previous firm and gave a Black History talk about the impact of what we're doing. Mind you, almost 70-80% of the students there were Black or Black British. One thing that stood out was its significant impact. I could see his face. He was pleased that I came, and the vision and the impact he left on the students showed that it was an opportunity to encourage the students to become Entrepreneurs.

One thing that was particularly poignant from my perspective was giving back, and that's something I wanted to lead with. He was pleased with my talk. It gave him brownie points; some clout with the kids. I was happy to help where I could.

Now he was one of the few good men because of his life principles. He was a role model to me. Why? Because of the way he did things, he approached them with care, compassion, and a profound elegance. As a Sigma Chi, I hold seven virtues close to my heart. They are my guide, standard, and benchmark for who I consider friends and from whom I learn. Everyone I hold close has good character, fair ability, ambitious purposes, a congenial disposition, good morals, a high sense of honor, and a deep sense of responsibility. These seven virtues are rare. It's good to have standards. Without them, your beliefs fall apart, and you lack integrity. James had all these virtues. In today's world, he would have been a Sigma Chi. I say that because he is one of the few good men.

​

Supporting James's Legacy

In memory of James Neophytou, contributions can be made to The King's College Hospital Charity, where he received care during his final journey. Your support helps continue the compassionate medical care that meant so much to him and our family.

Donate to The King's College Hospital Charity in James's Memory

James's Published Works

James leaves behind a intellectual legacy through his writings, which continue to offer wisdom on simplicity, complexity, and the human experience:

We've got it SIMPLE, but we've made it COMPLICATED - A reflection on how we overcomplicate life's fundamental truths

Angels & Morphia - His profound observations on life, mortality, and meaning

As we know, the Deepseek R1 AI foundational model has been making headlines, with some even calling it the Sputnik moment for AI. I beg to differ—here’s why. Before discussing the pros and cons of R1, we need to take a step back and zoom out to understand where we are in the AI market. I presented a keynote at EF in 2019 on the future of AI and blockchain, and my thesis remains true. As part of my thesis, I demonstrated that AI will eventually converge and that brute force and excessive computing do not necessarily yield better models—in fact, the benefits taper off dramatically.

I firmly believe that a state-of-the-art R&D lab can build a foundational model or large language model (LLM) for less than $10 million with a team of fewer than 5 ML researchers/engineers—and even build a $1 billion company—by using optimization and agents with a hierarchical chain of command to create a high level of order in the model. I explore that idea by first explaining why brute-force scaling meets diminishing returns, then illustrating the argument with concrete examples and breakthrough research, and finally reinforcing the notion that lean, efficient systems represent the future of AI innovation. Ultimately, this means that anyone, regardless of scale, can challenge the incumbents in the AI space.

The principle behind diminishing returns is elegantly captured by the “law of J, S, and D curves.” Initially, models may experience exponential growth—a rapid "J curve"—but as more resources are poured into the system, improvements level off into an "S curve" and may eventually decline, entering a "D curve." This behavior, seen in phenomena ranging from the self-similarity of fractals to Pareto’s law in economics, indicates that additional compute only delivers marginal benefits after a certain threshold. Scaling laws for neural language models further support this observation, showing that as models grow larger, their performance improvements adhere to predictable power-law relations. In essence, it becomes more effective to focus on optimization and structured design rather than on expanding hardware capacity indiscriminately.

A groundbreaking insight emerging from recent research is that we are witnessing a convergence in intelligence driven by both the cost of computing and quality. As compute becomes more expensive beyond a critical point, incremental gains shrink, forcing innovators to develop smarter, more efficient algorithms. Many now hypothesize that this convergence reflects a fundamental property of complex systems—where power-law dynamics and inherent stochastic processes drive models toward an optimal architecture that intrinsically links quality with cost-efficiency. This revelation is truly mindblowing because it suggests that the future of AI will be defined not by raw scale but by elegant design.

Concrete examples from the industry vividly illustrate these points. Consider Deepseek R1, a breakthrough model that processed 14.8 trillion tokens using 2,048 Nvidia H800 GPUs. Despite consuming around 2.788 million GPU hours and costing approximately $5.58 million, its success was not solely due to vast compute power. Instead, Deepseek R1 was engineered to activate only the necessary components during inference, thereby reducing redundant processing and maximizing efficiency. This smart allocation of resources demonstrates that targeted optimization enables even modest budgets to achieve state-of-the-art performance.

Every Sunday afternoon, I play tournaments at the London Chess Club. Recently, I stumbled upon a YouTube video titled “Wall St Gambit.” Intrigued by a gambit I had never heard of, I clicked on it. It turned out to be a competition organized by Kaggle and FIDE Chess, challenging participants to create agents that play chess under strict resource constraints. In this simulation, competitors must develop an agent that operates effectively within severe CPU and memory limitations. This challenge illustrates that novel, optimized techniques can address growing complexity—not only in chess but also in advancements in modeling and inference techniques that extend well beyond traditional heuristic-based algorithms.

Additional evidence comes from the realm of chess AI. In competitions with stringent resource limits—such as systems operating with just 5 MiB of RAM, a single 2.20GHz CPU core, and a 64KiB submission size cap—developers have crafted algorithms that excel despite severe constraints. Techniques like the Minimax algorithm, enhanced by alpha-beta pruning, and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) are computationally intensive and perform a depth-first search through every branch. To simulate against the engine, I used a small but robust agent employing efficient, well-optimized algorithms and heuristics, utilizing the following methods: Null Move Pruning, Internal Iterative Reductions, Late Move Pruning, Reverse Futility Pruning, Quiescence Search, Razoring. I was able to see effective results and run about 4MiB under the 5MiB RAM; this was written in C++ for performance and optimization.

The conversation about efficiency is further enriched by recent discussions on scaling laws, which indicate that as models scale, their performance improvements follow predictable power-law relations—a phenomenon observed in many fields, from physics to biology. This perspective explains why Deepseek V3 is generating buzz in the LLM community, as its novel architecture and optimization techniques set new standards for efficiency. Reinforcing dramatic performance improvements achieved through lean design and innovative thinking, these insights underscore that breakthroughs are bypassing traditional dependencies on established hardware platforms like NVIDIA’s CUDA.

Despite skepticism from those who insist that only massive budgets and large teams can yield groundbreaking AI models, the evidence increasingly supports a leaner approach. Critics argue that high performance necessitates extensive hardware investments, yet the success of systems like Deepseek R1 and Deepseek V3, along with the ingenious design of efficient chess engines, tells a different story. While industry giants like NVIDIA continue to dominate the hardware, infrastructure, and kernel layers—having built entire ecosystems that resemble cities—the application layer remains nascent and ripe for innovation. In other words, anyone with a smart, efficient strategy can compete with and potentially outmaneuver the established players in foundational models and LLMs.

The state of play in AI suggests that the coming years will be defined by the ability to do more with less. As research continues to validate the power-law scaling in neural language models, we can expect breakthroughs that favor intelligent, lean designs over brute-force scaling. This convergence on efficiency not only promises to revolutionize AI but also carries significant market and geopolitical implications. Varying approaches to data privacy, governmental oversight, and the rapid evolution of hardware and software infrastructures are reshaping the competitive landscape. In this emerging environment, the future belongs to those who can maximize performance while minimizing resource expenditure—a future where convergence on intelligence becomes the norm.

In conclusion, the future of AI is not about amassing endless compute power or expanding teams to unsustainable sizes. Instead, it is about strategically deploying resources—leveraging optimization, employing hierarchical structures, and using intelligent design to create models that deliver exceptional performance with minimal inputs. In short, a state-of-the-art R&D lab can build a foundational model/LLM for under $10 million with a few dedicated and experienced researchers building a unicorn. With mounting evidence from scaling laws, breakthrough models like Deepseek, and ongoing discussions in the AI community, it is clear that efficiency is the new frontier. The convergence on intelligence—doing more with less—is not just an ideal; it is the roadmap for shifting the focus from brute-force computation to elegant and efficient design, proving that anyone can compete with the incumbents in foundational models and LLMs.

Setting the Stage

As we step into 2025, I find myself reflecting on a year of transformation and resilience. The economic and financial landscape is undergoing seismic shifts, marked by higher-for-longer interest rates, accelerating technological innovation, and global geopolitical recalibrations. For me, 2024 was a year of immense learning and growth, both professionally and personally, as I navigated the evolving venture and wealth management ecosystem.

This moment of reflection is not just about looking back—it’s also about envisioning the path ahead. Today, I’m sharing my observations, lessons learned, and predictions for the macroeconomic climate, venture ecosystem, and private equity landscape as we gear up for a year of recalibration and opportunity.

2024 Reflections: Lessons from the Venture Ecosystem

The venture capital world continues to grapple with a cooling period, underscored by a 25% decline in active VC firms since 2021. This “VC winter” serves as a reminder of the cyclical nature of markets—a truth my grandmother, who lived through the Great Depression, taught me early on (Stanford). Her words, “Wealth is not just about accumulation but about resilience,” resonate deeply in these moments of recalibration.

From 2014 to 2021, we witnessed an unprecedented surge in VC activity fueled by enthusiasm for innovation and growth. However, as market realities shift, I see an opportunity to realign strategies, focusing on frontier technologies and bracing for the symbiotic age ahead. This is not just a correction; it’s an evolution.

Key Takeaway: As valuations stabilize and dry powder in VC funds depletes, the firms that survive will be those that double down on operational value creation, adopt frontier technologies, and innovate new business models. Growth equity and innovative startups will remain at the forefront, but success will require new business models and frontier technology.

Macroeconomic Outlook: Living with Higher for Longer

The global macroeconomic climate is defined by what I term "the new normal": elevated interest rates that are likely to persist throughout 2025. According to Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan’s outlooks, this new equilibrium presents both challenges and opportunities. Inflation is cooling, and central banks are beginning easing cycles, but the pace and impact will vary by region.

Key Predictions for 2025:

1. The U.S. economy is poised for a soft landing, with inflation approaching the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and rate cuts resuming.
2. Europe faces unique headwinds, including political instability and regulatory pressures, but also opportunities if structural reforms materialize.
3. Emerging markets, especially India, will shine as demographic tailwinds and technological advancements bolster growth.

Key Point: For wealth managers and investors, diversification will be crucial. Allocating across geographies and asset classes—particularly into fixed income, green bonds, and mid-cap equities—can offer a hedge against volatility.

Disruptive Technology: The Year of AI and Edge Computing

2025 is poised to be the year of AI agents and edge computing, transforming industries such as finance, healthcare, and law. Enterprise AI and vertical large language models (LLMs) will dominate workflows, orchestrating complex tasks and simplifying operations. Major software companies, including Salesforce, ServiceNow, Microsoft, and Workday, have already launched AI agents that promise to make business processes more hands-off (McKinsey). NVIDIA’s recent unveiling of Project Digits exemplifies this trend.

Project Digits: A compact AI supercomputer the size of a Mac Mini, this $3,000 device democratizes AI by enabling small businesses and developers to run up to 200-billion-parameter LLMs locally without cloud infrastructure (Huang). This innovation parallels the disruption custom-built PCs brought to the computing industry in the 2000s, offering a decentralized, secure alternative to traditional setups.

Neural Scaling Laws: Advances in scaling laws further bolster AI efficiency. These laws, which define performance improvements through the scaling of compute, parameters, and data, will guide resource allocation and model development in 2025.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, announced o3 during the company’s “12 Days of OpenAI” event in December 2024. The AI model scored 87.5% on ARC-AGI, a test designed to measure how well computers can think like humans. This score beats the average human score of 80%, marking the first time an AI system has outperformed people on this benchmark. To achieve that high-water mark, o3 used well over $1,000 of computing power per task—over 170 times more computing than a low-power version of o3 and leagues beyond its predecessor, which cost less than $4 per task.

Predictions:

1. AI Agents: Enterprises will increasingly adopt autonomous AI agents for bespoke workflows, such as screening sales leads and managing IT systems.

2. Edge Computing: As devices like Project Digits gain traction, the decentralization of AI workloads will become the norm.

3. Vertical LLMs: Tailored models will drive efficiencies in niche industries, particularly finance, healthcare, and law.

Quantum Technology: Unlocking Superalignment

As AI progresses, quantum computing will play a pivotal role in achieving superalignment—a critical step toward handling more complex and efficient systems. Google's recent unveiling of the Willow Quantum Chip marks a milestone in quantum performance. With best-in-class results in quantum error correction and random circuit sampling, this chip positions quantum computing as a game-changer for industries ranging from AI development to cryptography (Google).

The Hierarchy of AI:

• ANI (Artificial Narrow Intelligence): Today's AI systems like LLMs and generative AI tools.
• AGI (Artificial General Intelligence): Theoretical systems with human-level intelligence capable of solving diverse problems and teaching themselves new tasks.
• ASI (Artificial Superintelligence): Hypothetical AI surpassing human intellectual capabilities. Although ASI remains speculative, advancements in ANI and AGI are accelerating toward its potential realization (LinkedIn, Batra).

My belief is that quantum computing will be essential for achieving superalignment in AGI and paving the way for solving humanity's most complex challenges. The combination of AI and quantum technology represents the next frontier of innovation and progress.

Geopolitics: Roadmaps for a Reshaped World

The geopolitical landscape is more dynamic than ever, with heightened tensions and evolving alliances reshaping global economic and financial systems. One notable trend is the increasing adoption of Bitcoin by nation-states as a strategic reserve asset. This shift, while still nascent, signals a growing desire among countries to hedge against dollar dependence and navigate global financial uncertainty (Forbes).

The ongoing conflict in Eastern Europe remains a flashpoint, disrupting supply chains and prompting nations to reassess their energy security strategies. Meanwhile, the U.S.-China rivalry continues to influence trade, technology development, and capital flows, further dividing the global economy into competing blocs.

Governments and sovereign funds that navigate these complexities with localized strategies, diversified operations, and bold investments in frontier technologies will emerge as winners in this reshaped world.

Key Developments to Watch:

1. State Adoption of Cryptocurrencies: As countries experiment with Bitcoin as a reserve asset, this could create volatility in global financial systems while also redefining the role of traditional reserve currencies like the dollar.

2. Energy Security and Transition: European nations are doubling down on renewable energy investments, while resource-rich nations leverage energy markets as geopolitical tools.

3. Tech Wars and Innovation: The competition between the U.S. and China in AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing will not only drive innovation but also shape the economic strategies of allied nations.

A Personal Note: Resilience and Opportunity

As I reflect on 2024, I am reminded of the importance of adaptability. From my own journey of navigating the venture world to witnessing shifts in global markets, one thing remains constant: the value of human connection and foresight. Reflecting on the lessons of 2024, my grandmother’s wisdom holds constant: “True wealth lies in resilience and opportunity.” This belief drives my work and informs my predictions for the year ahead.

In 2025, I am committed to continuing this journey, sharing insights, and fostering meaningful discussions. Amid global transformation, I remain optimistic. Whether through AI agents revolutionizing workflows, the growing importance of the new normal, or recalibrated strategies in private markets, 2025 is a year to reimagine what’s possible. For those who join me in reading The Brief, I look forward to exploring these themes with you in depth. Let’s embrace this new year with optimism, confidence, and a shared commitment to innovation and growth.

Sources

• Batra, Ravi. "Superintelligence and Superalignment: Existential Risks for Humanity." LinkedIn, 2024.
• Google. "Google Willow Quantum Chip." Google Research Blog, 2024.
• Goldman Sachs Asset Management. "2025 Outlook: Reasons to Recalibrate." Goldman Sachs, 2025.
• Huang, Jensen. "Project Digits: Democratizing AI with Edge Computing." NVIDIA Blog, 2024.
• J.P. Morgan Asset Management. "2025 Global Market Outlook." J.P. Morgan, 2025.
• McKinsey & Company. "Why Agents Are the Next Frontier of Generative AI." McKinsey Digital, 2024.
• Stanford, Kyle. "VC Winter: A 25% Decline in Active Firms." PitchBook Blog, 2024.
• "Nation-States Turn to Bitcoin as a Strategic Reserve Asset." Forbes, 2025.